52 Movies?
12/30/2015
I should have brought this up a couple of weeks ago. The next-to-last day of the year is pretty late.
Someone suggested 52 movies as a group project for next year. I'm willing, because I think it would be a good bit easier than 52 authors (52 books would have been more manageable). With movies, I could always come up with something if the person who had that week wasn't able to deliver. I could commit to doing one week out of every month, which would be a bigger proportion than with the books, but still leave 40 open for others.
Let me remind you that Janet is also doing a 52 Saints at her blog and I know many or most of us plan to contribute that. She's going to be doing those on Sundays, so if we do the movies, I would publish them on Wednesday or Thursday.
So if you want to do this, speak up. No need to pin down specific weeks at this point. We can just start by seeing if there's enough interest to proceed.
I'm pretty sure we were all assuming we were doing this, and I will tell you (in case by some unbelievable coincidence others are planning on writing about them) that I will write about 3 movies (at least) My Old Lady, The Bird People of China, and a Studio Ghibli film called Porco Rosso.
I think it would be nice if it's at all possible for us to know ahead of time what people are writing about so that we can watch some of them and be able to discuss them without worrying about spoilers.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 12/30/2015 at 08:59 AM
I'll be happy to write about "Master and Commander." I'm not sure yet what others I would write about.
Posted by: Louise | 12/30/2015 at 09:04 AM
I think this is a great idea. I would volunteer to write about The Tree of Life, Magnolia, and Ostrov (unless someone else wants them).
I might be able to manage a few others too, but I'll think about which ones. As you say, writing about a movie is easier than writing about an author's whole body of work.
Posted by: Craig | 12/30/2015 at 10:16 AM
Count me in, although I'm not exactly sure which movies yet.
Posted by: Rob G | 12/30/2015 at 11:41 AM
I'm in.
Posted by: Paul | 12/30/2015 at 01:15 PM
I will do mainly Ealing comedies
Posted by: Grumpy | 12/30/2015 at 06:08 PM
If we're going that far back I might do some Second World War propaganda films. It will keep me from giving in to the temptation to write about nothing but Cantonese and Korean action films.
Posted by: Paul | 12/30/2015 at 06:59 PM
I love the Battle of the Bulge and Dunkirk
All those John Mills films
Posted by: Grumpy | 12/30/2015 at 07:37 PM
Funny, Grumpy, I was just this morning remembering Ealing's The Ladykillers. Loved that movie, especially the little old lady, Mrs. Wilberforce. And I think it was maybe Alec Guinness’s best performance.
Posted by: Marianne | 12/30/2015 at 08:36 PM
If you want The Ladykillers you can have it
I will do Kind Hearts and Coronets and
The Man in the White Suit
And some others
Posted by: Grumpy | 12/30/2015 at 08:46 PM
I love Kind Hearts and Coronets.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 12/30/2015 at 08:51 PM
Oh, no, Grumpy, you do Ladykillers. I'd much rather read what you have to say about it.
Posted by: Marianne | 12/30/2015 at 09:00 PM
You were wonderful on Mary Renault
My favourite by Janet was Rumer Godden
Posted by: Grumpy | 12/30/2015 at 09:10 PM
Ok, great, we clearly have enough interest to take the leap. I didn't remember, Janet, that there was such a definite commitment when we discussed it earlier.
I was going to lay claim to all of Bergman but it appears that that may not be necessary. Not that I'll write about *all* of them, but four or five, at least. I'll undoubtedly revisit some, and not only Bergman, that I've previously written about here.
So, on or around Epiphany, I'll start things off.
I believe I've seen those Ealing comedies. Several of them, definitely. And I found them ever so slightly disappointing--not that I didn't like them, but I didn't like them as much as I expected to.
Oh, and Paul, as for going back, as far as I'm concerned there are no restrictions on that. Maybe I'll do Birth of a Nation.
Posted by: Mac | 12/30/2015 at 09:35 PM
Anne-Marie did Mary Renault. It's the similarity between Marianne and Anne-Marie thing that does it. Sometimes when I see the Anne-Marie byline, even I think it's by me. ;-)
Posted by: Marianne | 12/30/2015 at 10:47 PM
Oooo
Posted by: Grumpy | 12/31/2015 at 12:32 AM
Anne-Marie and Marianne--I have that problem frequently--not so much when I read them and see your names, but when I'm trying to remember which one wrote what.
My real problem, though, is with Robert Gotcher and Rob G.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 12/31/2015 at 07:06 AM
Yes, I sometimes do a double take when it seems Robert or Rob is agreeing or disagreeing with himself.
Posted by: Paul | 12/31/2015 at 07:51 AM
It's nothing to having a classful of French-speakers, half of them called Louise, Marie-Louise, Anne-Marie, Marie-Anne, Marion, Marianne, Claire, Marie-Claire, etc. etc.
Posted by: Paul | 12/31/2015 at 07:54 AM
Oh well, I work in a parish full of Hispanics and Irish Travellers. Every woman here is named Maria or Mary or Marie.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 12/31/2015 at 09:52 AM
Maclin, about the definite commitment. Well, almost the moment that the 52 Authors got underway, there was a discussion about what we were going to write 52 things about next year. I don't think that could have been easily avoided. ;-)
I did not know at the time, however, that is was going to spread.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 12/31/2015 at 09:54 AM
I disagree with myself all the time.
Posted by: Robert Gotcher | 12/31/2015 at 01:32 PM
Me too.
Posted by: Mac | 12/31/2015 at 02:00 PM
Nice ambiguity there, Maclin.
Thank you, Grumpy.
I could do a couple--Jesus of Montreal and Raising Arizona come to mind.
Posted by: Anne-Marie | 12/31/2015 at 04:53 PM
"Robert and I sometimes disagree with ourselves." Is that ambiguous? Does the pope ever disagree with themselves. I wonder?
Posted by: Mac | 12/31/2015 at 08:59 PM
Happy New Year!
Posted by: Robert Gotcher | 12/31/2015 at 11:25 PM
Happy New Year!
Posted by: Paul | 01/01/2016 at 10:52 AM
Yes, Happy New Year to all of you and yours.
And don't forget to go to Mass today, if you're Catholic, which I think most everybody who comments here is, though maybe not everyone who reads.
Posted by: Mac | 01/01/2016 at 11:06 AM
Happy new year, everybody!
Posted by: Louise | 01/01/2016 at 12:50 PM
Happy new year! (a day late...)
I'll probably sit this one out, I don't watch too many movies (although there's one I might consider). I'll be interested to see what people have to say, though.
Posted by: godescalc | 01/02/2016 at 04:42 AM
I am in. There will probably be some violent ones. I'll try not to be overly descriptive. But I'll start with Woody Allen and Annie Hall.
Happy New Year to you all! I have been out of town, out of pocket, with limited computer use available.
Spent the first two nights away at the Jesuit retreat house in Grand Coteau, Louisiana and left there on the 27th to drive up to Missouri through the maelstrom of flooding, water, etc. Made it okay, but when you are at a Jesuit retreat house you get zero information about the outside world.
All is well that ends well.
Posted by: Stu | 01/02/2016 at 08:58 AM
Maclin, I thought it could also mean that you disagree with Robert all the time.
Posted by: Anne-Marie | 01/02/2016 at 11:20 AM
Happy new year!
We went to mass, which turned out to be a very simple mass even though it was a holy day. The pastor has scheduled the main mass for noon, forgetting that the Nigerian chaplaincy would be using the church for its 12:30 mass.
Posted by: Anne-Marie | 01/02/2016 at 11:23 AM
Glad you made it without mishap. Also glad to hear that a Jesuit retreat house takes the retreat part seriously.:-)
I went up to north AL and back through some *really* heavy rain, and stayed on a mountain. There was so much rain that it couldn't even run off the mountaintop fast enough to keep the roads from being under water here and there.
Funny, I was thinking the other day about watching Annie Hall again and wondering if it was really any good. I'll look forward to hearing what you have to say. I don't think you need to worry about discussing a violent movie.
Godescalc, I doubt that every week is going to be filled far in advance, so if you do see something you want to discuss, feel free to jump in.
Posted by: Mac | 01/02/2016 at 11:23 AM
Oh, and a by the way for everybody who wants to participate in the movie discussion: we've been assuming single movies, but if there is a distinct set of related movies that you want to discuss as a group, we can make an exception for that. This occurred to me the other day as I started watching the "Apu" trilogy (Indian, from the '50s, and considered classic), and which I will most likely write about if no one else does first. The Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, The Godfather, et. al. (none of which I have designs on, so feel free to claim them). The first two of those especially would be hard to discuss other than as a group.
Posted by: Mac | 01/02/2016 at 11:29 AM
We cross-posted, Anne-Marie. But I'm glad you made it, too. :-)
I thought that was what you meant, and I meant, sort of lamely I guess, to be expanding the muddle to include all four possibilities: each disagreeing "all the time" with the other as well as himself.
Recent popes have dropped the "we" bit, which I'm glad of.
Posted by: Mac | 01/02/2016 at 11:35 AM
I'd be inclined to ask to do One of Our Aircraft is Missing and The Flemish Farm as a pair, even though they aren't strictly linked.
Posted by: Paul | 01/02/2016 at 02:01 PM
That's fine with me. I only vaguely recognize the first title, the second not at all.
Posted by: Mac | 01/02/2016 at 03:42 PM
Is One of our Aircraft about Malta?
I don't know the second one.
Posted by: Grumpy | 01/02/2016 at 03:59 PM
"Recent popes have dropped the "we" bit, which I'm glad of."
Me too, really. I forget why they used to say that.
Posted by: Louise | 01/02/2016 at 05:13 PM
Set in occupied Holland, Grumpy.
Posted by: Paul | 01/02/2016 at 06:22 PM
I'm thinking of Malta Story - where someone does go missing in an airplane
Posted by: Grumpy | 01/03/2016 at 11:34 AM
I recently watched The Dawn Patrol, a 1938 movie about the aviators of the first war. I expected it to be just a quaint period piece, but it's actually pretty good.
Louise, I always assumed that the papal "we" was borrowed from the practice of royalty. But I don't know.
Posted by: Mac | 01/03/2016 at 05:31 PM
Saints have started.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/03/2016 at 06:04 PM
The sidebar is so weird. It looks like everyone is asking questions.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/04/2016 at 07:43 AM
I am doing one for Janet in January, in August and in September.
So I will do one for Maclin in any of the other months - for instance, February, June, July, October, November, December.
I think my plan is for
Kind Hearts and Coronets
Danton
Man of Marble / Man of Iron
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Les Enfants du Paradis
Au Revoir les Enfants
But I have not completely made up my mind yet!
Posted by: Grumpy | 01/04/2016 at 09:04 AM
Passport to Pimlico is another favourite.
Posted by: Grumpy | 01/04/2016 at 09:07 AM
And July.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/04/2016 at 09:12 AM
Au Revoir les Enfants is a brilliant film. I haven't seen it since it was in the cinemas, but I remember it so clearly!
Posted by: Paul | 01/04/2016 at 09:46 AM
Yes, it is.
Anybody want to commit to the weeks of January after this one? i.e. the 13th, 20th, and 27th? I don't feel so anxious about laying out the schedule well in advance, since these should be easier to write. I don't expect mine to be very long though of course I may get carried away sometimes.
Posted by: Mac | 01/04/2016 at 10:34 AM
I'll do the 13th. If I commit to something, it will make me finish what I've started writing.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/04/2016 at 11:03 AM
"How do I know why there were Nazis? I can't even figure out how to use the can-opener!"
Sure, put me down, Mac. That line is actually from Hannah and Her Sisters, not Annie Hall, but I'll stick with Annie Hall to begin.
Posted by: Stu | 01/04/2016 at 11:10 AM
Ok, thanks to you both. Stu, you get the 20th. I'll start a schedule page.
Posted by: Mac | 01/04/2016 at 12:39 PM
A belated Happy New Year, everyone! I was out of town and largely offline for the weekend.
Mac, I'll take Jan. 27 and do Kurosawa's 'Yojimbo.' I got the DVD for Christmas, but I haven't watched the movie in quite a while, and want to, so this'll kill two birds with one stone.
Posted by: Rob G | 01/05/2016 at 06:33 AM
OK, that is Bonaventure, Janet. Do you want to do Saint James? I know you have a strong devotion to the camino. If you want me to do it, I can
Posted by: Grumpy | 01/05/2016 at 06:40 AM
I could do something, if you need me.
Posted by: Michael | 01/05/2016 at 06:45 AM
"Yo, Jimbo!"
Posted by: Stu | 01/05/2016 at 07:48 AM
Rob, I'll be interested to hear what you have to say about 'Yojimbo.' I'm not familiar with that one, but we watched 'I Live in Fear' year before last and I really liked it--although "like" probably isn't the right word.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/05/2016 at 09:38 AM
Looks like we could probably come up with 365 Movies--not that I'm suggesting that.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/05/2016 at 09:39 AM
I'm sure we could. But I'm very definitely not suggesting it.
Michael, are you referring to movies or saints?
Posted by: Mac | 01/05/2016 at 12:58 PM
Michael is referring to movies but he might make time for saints to if Janet orders him about.
Posted by: Grumpy | 01/05/2016 at 01:21 PM
Is Michael a friend of mine on Facebook? If he is, then I will definitely order him around.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/05/2016 at 02:07 PM
He should write about somebody obscure and fascinating.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/05/2016 at 02:11 PM
In any case, he's quite welcome to contribute a movie, or movies.
Michael, there aren't any strict rules: a single movie, or possibly a set of related movies such as a trilogy, some reasonable word length. I think one of the 52 Authors series touched the 3000-word mark, which is fairly long for a blog post.
Naturally I reserve the right not to publish something grossly offensive, but I really doubt anyone interested in reading this blog, or writing for it, would be interested in publishing something grossly offensive--I'm thinking of out-and-out pornography, or what I have heard called "horror porn", or gross falsehoods. I wonder if Jack Chick ever made any movies?
I guess I better go ahead and formally reserve Winter Light and Wild Strawberries for myself. I'll probably do some other Bergmans, too, depending on whether anyone else does them first.
Posted by: Mac | 01/05/2016 at 03:49 PM
Mac, I just watched Fanny and Alexander, and I'd like you to write about it. Start with why it's called Fanny and Alexander!
Posted by: Craig | 01/05/2016 at 04:01 PM
Well...it's been a while since I saw it and I don't remember it all that well, but maybe because it's about Fanny and Alexander? :-) Or is it not much about Fanny? I don't remember as much about her as about him. In fact now that you mention it I may vaguely recollect thinking that she didn't play that big a role.
I wasn't planning to write about it, though. I wasn't very keen on it.
Posted by: Mac | 01/05/2016 at 05:41 PM
I've just emailed a piece on The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp that I hope you can use.
Posted by: Paul | 01/05/2016 at 07:11 PM
Paul, You're so industrious.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/05/2016 at 07:55 PM
Not at all. That's the thing.
Posted by: Paul | 01/05/2016 at 08:16 PM
Haven't read my email yet but I'm quite sure I can use it. Thanks.
Posted by: Mac | 01/05/2016 at 08:57 PM
Mac--I'll take "Wings of Desire" (name a week)
Janet--Edith Stein? (hopefully not the same week Mac names)
Posted by: Michael | 01/05/2016 at 10:33 PM
That's just it, Mac. Fanny is in the movie, but she's awfully peripheral: just a few lines, not much screen time, and no influence on the story as far as I can see.
I didn't much care for the film either. Alright, I withdraw my request.
Posted by: Craig | 01/05/2016 at 11:10 PM
Excellent. Interesting film. I put you down for Feb 10.
I've just slapped together a schedule and put it on the sidebar, in the "Here" box. Maybe I can take some time tomorrow and replace that 52 Authors schedule with a page of links to the pieces (kindly provided by Janet).
Posted by: Mac | 01/05/2016 at 11:17 PM
Cross-posted, I was replying to Michael. That is kind of weird, Craig...but when you asked about it earlier I glanced at the Wikipedia article on it and saw that it was originally 5(!) hours long. If you/we didn't see that version--I'm quite sure I didn't--maybe she was more prominent in that one.
Posted by: Mac | 01/05/2016 at 11:19 PM
Janet, although I like Kurosawa's films of contemporary life like "I Live in Fear," I'm more partial to his historical movies, of which "Yojimbo" is one.
The one exception would be "Ikiru," which is contemporary, but is one of my favorite films. The only A.K. film I life more is "Ran," his take on "King Lear." "Ikiru" is in my top ten all-time, "Ran" in the top five.
Posted by: Rob G | 01/06/2016 at 06:18 AM
It's too bad they aren't more easily accessible.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/06/2016 at 07:50 AM
Michael, Edith Stein is already spoken for. You can see the list here and the schedule so far here. As you can see, not all saints have been scheduled for a definite week. This is a link to the blog itself, and the above links are also on the sidebar there.
I think people have taken some other saints on this thread and I am writing about Pier Giorgio Frassati in February. I'm going to update the lists later today.
Thanks for volunteering--or being volunteered.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/06/2016 at 08:01 AM
Grumpy, James is one of the saints I have already written about on the blog, so I don't plan on writing about him again, although you are welcome to do so if you wish.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/06/2016 at 08:04 AM
"It's too bad they aren't more easily accessible."
Most of the ones I've watched I've gotten through the library. Criterion seems to have released almost all of AK's films, so they're out there, but you have to do a little hunting.
Posted by: Rob G | 01/06/2016 at 09:45 AM
And pay a few dollars. I'll check my library. I guess I could get them through inter-library loan.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/06/2016 at 09:47 AM
Yeah, that's what I've done. My local library had quite a few of them, but outside of those I went through ILL.
Posted by: Rob G | 01/06/2016 at 10:20 AM
I don't mind Michael doing Edith Stein. I'd be interested to read what somebody else has to say.
Posted by: Paul | 01/06/2016 at 10:20 AM
Yojimbo is on Netflix, Janet, along with a good many other Kurosawa films.
Which is the one where the same story is seen from several different points of view? I've seen that one, and Seven Samurai, and didn't wasn't that crazy about either one. I should try them again. I think part of the problem was that they were somewhat murky VHS tapes.
Posted by: Mac | 01/06/2016 at 11:13 AM
Well, the one I saw was a murky DVD.
AMDG
Posted by: Janet | 01/06/2016 at 12:06 PM
"the same story is seen from several different points of view"
Rashomon
The most recent Criterion DVD release of this, which I watched not too long ago, is very good quality-wise.
Posted by: Rob G | 01/06/2016 at 01:53 PM
You can count on Criterion to make the picture quality as good as it can be made.
Posted by: Mac | 01/06/2016 at 02:26 PM