52 Movies: Week 18 - Wild Strawberries

(Since there's nothing else on hand for this week, I'm re-posting this, slightly updated, from October 2007.) 

When I decided to re-acquaint myself with the Bergman films I had seen and loved many years ago, and to see those I hadn’t, this was my first step, and as it turned out a very good place to begin. I would recommend it to anyone who’s curious about Bergman but has been put off by what they’ve heard about him, or perhaps, as someone said here a while back, by a bad experience with one of his more difficult or disturbing works.

This film is also a good example of what makes the non-religious Bergman so interesting to some Christians, especially to Catholics. It’s not only that he takes on the big questions and treats them profoundly. It’s that many of the themes of Christian spiritual life work themselves out on an earthly level in the lives of his characters. Wild Strawberries is very similar in that respect to Babette’s Feast, another great film which has no religious intention but is much loved by Catholics because it bears such deep and clear parallels to certain aspects of the faith. It’s not hard to suppose—in fact it’s hard not to suppose—that Bergman’s childhood as the son of a Lutheran clergyman left his mind deeply impressed with Christian ways of thinking even though he rejected the faith. He consistently confirms our belief that the empty place in the human heart is, in fact, as we are so often told, God-shaped.

Wild Strawberries might be described as a story about Purgatory, an earthly and secular rendering of the process we can all expect to undergo after death. It’s a process that frequently begins before death for one who is open to it, a painful process of recognizing how and where one has failed and what one may have lost as a result—a recognition which may itself be the punishment for those failures—and of preparing to accept forgiveness. The film is the account of one day in the life of an elderly physician, Isak Borg, in which both internal and external events come together to confront him with his failures as lover, husband, and father, bringing him a deep and almost unbearable pain (“Is there no mercy?” he begs at one point) followed by the beginnings of reconciliation. And it’s so beautifully done in every way, so rich in its details and their meanings, that anyone who is susceptible to Bergman’s art is likely to find himself wanting to watch it over and over again.

The Criterion Collection (may it be praised) DVD also includes an interview with Bergman. Any Bergman fan who’s acquainted with Wild Strawberries but hasn’t seen this interview should seek this disk out at once. It was done in 1998, when Bergman was 80 and semi-retired. He comes across as a surprisingly unpretentious man, given his achievement and celebrity. Toward the end of the interview he speaks interestingly and movingly about death and faith.

The first comes up in reference to his beloved third wife, whom he married in 1971 and who had died in 1995. His grief is plain; he describes himself, calmly, as “crippled” by her death. And he goes on to say that after having been terribly afraid of death for many years he had, around the time he made The Seventh Seal, at last taken comfort in the idea that it would be a simple extinction. But his wife’s death has disturbed this comfort: that he might never meet her again is “an unbearable thought,” in “violent conflict” with his previously comforting views. Anyone who has his own unbearable thoughts will sympathize.

And when the interviewer asks him if he has perhaps returned to faith in his old age, Bergman dismisses the idea with a laugh, but then begins to reflect: he is “not what you would call religious in any way” but has “a whole lot of ideas about other realities that surround me. I have the feeling sometimes that we’re part of an infinitely larger pattern….You can feel that sometimes.”

Indeed. Or, in the words Bergman gave to Isak Borg some fifty years ago: “In this jumble of events, I seemed to discern an extraordinary logic.”

Here's the Criterion Collection trailer:

 

 

•••

Postscript: This Is More Like It

On the occasion of Bergman’s death in July of 2007, I was irritated by a rather stupid (may as well speak plainly) dismissal of his work by John Podhoretz. Some weeks later my late friend Robert sent me a link to this far more perceptive piece by John Simon. Perhaps the Shakespeare comparison reaches too far, but I have no doubt that Simon is far closer to the mark.

 

Comments

[Stu]

This is one of the few Bergman films I have seen and I do recall feeling very moved by it. I need to revisit it, as this was probably 20 years ago and I only saw it the one time.

[Stu]

By the way Mac, Wikipedia claims that Wild Strawberries has directly influenced four of Woody Allen's movies, and lists them and the similarities in case you are interested.

[Janet]

It’s a process that frequently begins before death for one who is open to it, a painful process of recognizing how and where one has failed and what one may have lost as a result—a recognition which may itself be the punishment for those failures

This has been the great theme of my life lately. I saw this when I was in my 30s--I think it was my 30s--and didn't get it at all. I wonder if you have to be older.

AMDG

[Janet]

I have, by the way, seen it since--probably when you wrote this--and liked it a lot.

AMDG

[Mac]

I think probably you do have to be older, Janet. I certainly got it in 2007. I think I did see it when I was a good bit younger, but am not even certain of that, and definitely don't have any idea what my reaction was.

I read that on Wikipedia, Stu, and considered linking to it in the post in part specifically for your benefit, but decided not to because it has a plot summary, not that the plot has any huge surprises. It made me want to see those Allen movies (again in a couple of cases).

[Janet]

I can write something for next week.

AMDG

[Mac]

That would be appreciated. But don't feel like you've got to try to fill the gap. It's looking like there's not going to be nearly enough contributions to get us through the remaining 2/3 of the year. So my plan is to do as many as necessary myself, but keeping them short, just a couple of paragraphs or two.

[Stu]

I'm happy to do more too, Mac. It is a good excuse to re-watch movies I love.

[Rob G]

I'm in the process of writing one now, and I have a couple more in mind for the next few weeks.

[Stu]

I notice that the comments become much more tangential about movies than they did about authors. I suppose that is because of the personal nature of reading as opposed to the less involved nature of watching. I read all of the "reviews" but I rarely think much beyond "well written", or "I would like to watch that movie". What does everyone think?

[Mac]

I don't know...I don't think there's necessarily a book-vs-movie difference for me. It probably has more to do with whether I've read or seen the work in question. If I haven't, my reaction is probably going to be "That sounds interesting, I'll consider it." Unless there's some particular idea brought forward that I want to comment on.

[Mac]

That would be great, Stu and Rob. Anything you have time and inclination to do is welcome.

Does anybody else find it impossible to say "that would be great" without thinking of this guy? Only if you haven't seen the movie in question, I'd guess.

[Janet]

Well, authors write lots of books (some of them), so there's a better chance that you have read something that they wrote, while movies, even if they are by famous directors, more or less stand alone.

Also, it's easier to discuss a book without spoilers, I think. There's more there.

AMDG

[Janet]

Plus, everybody knows something about Tolstoy and Flannery O'Connor, et al. You can take part in the discussion even if you haven't read the books.

AMDG

[Mac]

I try to avoid expressing opinions about books I haven't read, but sometimes I do it anyway. :-)

[Janet]

Well, I meant one could talk about the author. ;-)

AMDG

[Mac]

True.

[Stu]

Speaking of books I haven't read, my in-laws sent me a copy of Bill O'Reilly's Killing Jesus, which now holds a proud place on one of our shelves at home. I suppose I could move it to my office and be even prouder. :)

And this was for Christmas of all things, when we are celebrating the birth of Jesus!

[Mac]

I've seen references to that book and thought "huh?!?" and immediately forgot about it. Is it anti-Christian? I thought O'Reilly was at least nominally Catholic.

But yeah, any book by Bill O'Reilly surely deserves a place of honor. :-/

[Stu]

Geez, Mac, get with the program! He has an entire series: Killing Jesus, Killing Patton, Killing Kennedy, Killing Reagan ... there may be more. He doesn't dislike any of these people; I think it is all sort of conspiracy theory stuff surrounding their deaths, but I don't really know for sure. I should read the silly thing, it is fewer than 300 pages.

The questions is: When he passes will someone write a book called Killing O'Reilly? He is Catholic.

[Stu]

I forgot about Lincoln! I think the first book was Killing Lincoln.

Killing Prince should be coming soon!!

[Mac]

I think I'll stay without that particular program.

[Mac]

Just looked at Google News for the first time today (it's where I go for a quick look at the news) and I see a headline:

"Caitlyn Jenner to Pose Naked With Gold Medal for 'Sports Illustrated'"

I want to say something witty or at least sarcastic but I'm at a loss.

[Stu]

It is the sort of thing that should leave one speechless, Mac, so that's the correct response!