« Sunday Night Journal, August 19, 2018 | Main | Sunday Night Journal, August 26, 2018 »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Well I laughed when I clicked on the Poetry Foundation link and his face appeared. He looks as grim as you describe his work. Nice poem though.

Doesn't he though!

I haven't read much of Thomas but what I have read I've liked, including this one, which is new to me.

Each week I am impressed by these poets, and also that anyone knows who they are. I only know the "pop stars" of poetry; the names anyone would recognize. Apparently a lot of good writing has happened in this poorly (un?)paid field!

In my heart I still think poetry is *the* literary art form. I picked up that idea as an undergrad and it's still with me. So off and on I sort of get back into it.

I guess that's supposed to be "in the minds of young children". My eyes aren't great, but you may have written ninds instead.

Yes, thank you, I've fixed it now.

I like poetry a lot but I don't read as much of it as I feel I should. For me it requires considerable concentration, and often I'm too distracted.

I like Thomas and I like this one. It's rather sadly, ironically appropriate.


It does take more concentration, but it also takes less time, at least where lyric poetry is concerned, which is what we mostly mean by poetry nowadays. For reasons also having to do with distraction, but working out in a different way, I find it difficult to sit and read for any great length of time. For many years it was just impossible, and I think now it's partly a kind of conditioning. I can manage ten minutes focus on a poem, though.

Lovely poem. And for me a prelude to prayer.

I'm pretty much the opposite. I generally don't sit down to read something unless I have at least 20 minutes to commit to it, and I've always been one of those people who consistently reads for long stretches. With poetry it usually takes me a bit more time to settle into the thing, whereas I can pick up most other reading material and dive right in.

I don't think I've consistently read for long stretches since sometime in my 20s when I was single. When I say it was impossible for many years, I don't mean I wasn't capable of it, just that uninterrupted stretches of time more than 15 or 20 minutes pretty much didn't exist. Now, as I said, it's as if I've been conditioned in some way. I'm trying to break that. And the internet is definitely a factor in aggravating my attention deficit.

When I first started reading these books in my library, I had gotten to the point where I was incapable of reading more than 10 minutes at a time, and that really upset me. I had to force myself to sit and read for longer and longer periods. I've gotten to where that isn't much of a problem anymore unless what I am reading is difficult.


I take heart from your example. I know I can be better if I try. :-) One problem I have now that I didn't 30 and more years ago is the tendency to get extremely sleepy after about 15 minutes or so if it's after midday.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)